Gill Netting

Gill Netting (image © Seafish)

Gill nets are monofilament nylon nets that are set on the seabed and left to fish. Each end is anchored and the net is held to the seabed by a weighted ‘foot-rope’ and held up by a floating ‘head line.’ The size of mesh and the length of ‘soak time’ is specific to the species of fish being targeted and is governed by legislation for each fishery. Local fisheries bylaws govern mesh sizes within the Cornwall inshore fisheries district, and EU regulations govern mesh sizes outside of the 12 mile limit. Nets cannot be used during periods of strong tidal flows so around Cornwall most netters will stop fishing during spring tides.

Gill nets are designed to be selective. Fish smaller than the mesh size are able to pass through unharmed, and those larger than the mesh are deflected away when they hit the net (except in the case of tangle nets). Fish of the correct size are selected as their heads fit through the mesh and they are then caught by the gills.

Each gill net can be up to 114 metres long and several nets (up to 30) are tied together to make a tier. Large netting boats will deploy 5 or 6 tiers of nets per day, which can be almost 20km of nets. Compared with trawling, gill netting using far less fuel and thus has a lower carbon footprint as a fishing method.

Cornish fishermen use a variety of different netting methods:

Tangle nets are large mesh nets (20”), set slack on the seabed to entangle species such as monkfish, turbot, crawfish, Pollack and spider crab. 

Hake nets are set in deep water to target hake. They are 4 7/8” mesh and stand 5 metres high off the seabed.

Red mullet nets are small mesh nets, 70 – 90cm wide set close to shore to target high value red mullet.

Wreck nets are large mesh nets deployed over reefs and wrecks to catch pollack, saithe, ling and Cod.

 

Problems associated with gill netting

Because gill nets are set to fish and then left, there is scope for mobile fishing gear to be pulled through set nets even despite the best efforts of fishermen to communicate the net positions. This not only damages the mobile gear, but often results in the loss of the net. Practices such as wreck netting can also result in snagged or lost nets. Lost nets can continue to fish and are often termed ‘ghost nets’. They pose a real threat to marine life. The length of time they continue to fish depends on many factors, though fishermen argue that strong currents will roll the nets until they are no longer a threat. More evidence is needed to support this.

Another issue with gill nets is the risk to dolphins, porpoises and seals.  Monofilament nets are very difficult to see when they are in the water, and large predators (attracted by the presence of fish) can get accidentally caught in the nets. The scale of this problem has been highlighted by Cornwall Wildlife Trusts Marine Strandings Network in 2015, 96 dead cetaceans were found washed up on Cornish beaches, 12% of these were shown to have evidence of accidental bycatch and drowning in fishing nets.  Acoustic deterrent devices known as ‘pingers’ have been developed to significantly reduce the risk of bycatch by emitting a regular sonic noise which scares cetaceans (dolphins, porpoises and whales) away from nets. Use of pingers is now a legal requirement for all netting vessels over 10m in length, however smaller vessels are not yet required to use pingers. This is in part because the large pingers currently used on offshore vessels are so loud there are concerns that if these were to be used inshore it could potentially displace cetaceans from important feeding areas. Cornwall Wildlife Trust has trialled smaller, less problematic pinger devices on inshore nets, which resulted in successfully reducing cetacean activity around nets by around 80% Bannana Pinger Report These 'bannana' pingers are available from British company, Fishtek Marine

Bycatch of seabirds is also an issue for gill net fisheries in certain applications (notably bass nets in St Ives bay) as is bycatch of rare elasmobranch species such as long nosed skate and angel shark. Tangle nets are particularly effective at catching crawfish, a species that since the 1960’s has become very rare in southwest waters. This along with high catches by scuba divers is thought to explain the rapid reduction in crawfish populations documented at the end of the 20th century. 

 

Want to find out more? The following scientific papers give more detail on the impact of gill net fisheries:
 
CEFAS (2002) technical report (No. 116) on Coastal Fisheries of England & Wales for period 1999- 2001. 
 
 
Seafish,2014, ‘Ecological Risk Assessment of the effects of fishing for South West fisheries; ICES Divisions VII e,f,g & h,’ Seafish report SR670, ISBN No: 978-1-906634-76-6 
 
Sewell, J. & Hiscock, K., 2005. Effects of fishing within UK European Marine Sites:guidance for nature conservation agencies. Report to the Countryside Council for Wales,English Nature and Scottish Natural Heritage from the Marine Biological Association.Plymouth: Marine Biological Association. CCW Contract FC 73-03-214A. 195 pp. www.marlin.ac.uk/PDF/FishGuidance05_Final_Report_screen
 
Kaiser, M.J., Bullimore, B.,Newman, P., Lock, K. & Gilbert,S., 1996. Catches in ‘ghost fishing’ set nets. Marine Ecology
Progress Series, 145, 11-16.
 
Tregenza, N.J.C., 1997. Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena L.) Bycatch in set gillnets in the Celtic Sea. 54:896-904. ICES
Journal of Marine Science, 54,896-904.
 
FANTARED 2, A study to identify, quantify and ameliorate the impacts of static gear lost at sea EU Study Contract FAIR CT98-4338, FINAL REPORT To the Commission of the European Communities Authors Sea Fish Industry Authority, IMR Norway, IMR Sweden, AZTI Spain, CCMAR Portugal, IPIMAR Portugal, IFREMER France. ISBN No. 0 903941 97 X
 
2002, CEFAS technical report (No. 116) on Coastal Fisheries of England & Wales for period 1999- 2001.
 
Report to the European Commission on the implementation of Regulation  812/2004 by the United Kingdom for the calendar year 2010. Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU). Kingston and Northridge et al.
 
CEFAS (2002) technical report (No. 116) on Coastal Fisheries of England & Wales for period 1999- 2001. 
 

Other references

Ajax hake website has a detailed description on the method of hake netting with videos and illustrations.